Comparison
AEQI vs Superset
Superset runs many coding agents in parallel on your machine. AEQI is the company those agents work for — roles, a ledger, memory and a server of its own.
September 10, 2026 · Luca Eich

Choose Superset if you already run a software company and want one engineer to supervise a hundred coding agents at once, with the review tooling to make that survivable.
Choose AEQI if the company is the part that doesn’t exist yet — roles, a ledger, memory and a server, not just faster commits.
What Superset is
Superset describes itself, as of September 2026, as “an agentic IDE to orchestrate 100+ coding agents in parallel.” It runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor Agent, Gemini CLI, Copilot, OpenCode and other CLI tools side by side, each in its own git worktree with its own branch and terminal, watched from one dashboard. It was founded in 2026 by three former Y Combinator CTOs. The repository carries 14,100 stars under the Elastic License 2.0. The unit of the product is a workspace running on your own machine, using your own model subscriptions. The desktop app is free for one user; Pro is $15 to $20 per user per month; Enterprise is custom, annual, and quoted directly.
Side by side
| Question | Superset | AEQI |
|---|---|---|
| Who it's for | A developer or software team already running a company, wanting more engineering throughput. | A founder or small team that wants a company staffed by agents, not just faster software delivery. |
| Where it lives | A desktop app on your own machine, one git worktree per agent. | Its own hosted Company — a dedicated server in Germany, plus a website, app, API, MCP and CLI. |
| Agents and roles | No named roles — CLI coding agents run side by side, one per worktree, agent-agnostic by design. | Ten officer agents in named roles — CEO, CTO, COO, CFO, CMO, CRO, CPO, Chief of Staff, General Counsel, Founder's Associate — each with its own permissions. |
| Memory | None shared across agents; persistent terminal sessions and scheduled automations, but no memory that spans them. | A shared Company memory — mail, decisions and quests linked together — that outlives any single session. |
| Channels | None — a desktop dashboard, with Linear and Slack integrations on Pro. | One inbox across Email, Slack, Teams, Telegram and WhatsApp. |
| Hosting and data | Your own machine and your own model subscriptions; remote access in beta on Pro. | One hosted Company per customer, on its own server in Germany, with EU data residency. |
| Pricing | Free for one user; Pro $15 to $20 per user per month; Enterprise custom, annual only. | €50 (Personal, 1 seat, 1,250 credits), €200 (Startup, 4 seats, 5,000 credits) or €800 (Business, 16 seats, 20,000 credits) a month; two months free annually. |
| Trial | The free tier is permanent for one user; no time-boxed trial published for Pro. | 3-day free trial; 33% off Personal for the first 3 months through 31 October 2026. |
| Best for | A software team that wants one engineer to supervise many coding agents at once. | A founder whose company doesn't exist yet, or exists only as them, and needs it staffed. |
Superset is the better choice when
- You already run a software company — accounts, a website, customers — and the bottleneck is developer throughput, not company structure. Superset’s own comparison pages draw exactly this line: it is a developer workspace, not a platform that runs a company, and it lets one engineer supervise a hundred coding agents at once, each in its own git worktree and branch.
- You want to keep the model subscriptions you already pay for. Superset is agent-agnostic by design — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor Agent, Gemini CLI, Copilot and OpenCode run side by side on your own machine and your own accounts, with nothing new metered.
- Review speed and adoption matter more right now than shared memory across agents. The diff viewer, the in-app browser with per-workspace port detection, and one-click handoff to your editor are better than anything we ship for reviewing code, and the repository's 14,100 stars are a community we don’t have.
AEQI is the better choice when
- The company itself is the part that doesn’t exist yet — no accounts, no website, no roles — and the work is building that, not reviewing a pull request against a business that’s already running.
- You want a record of the reasoning, not just the result: a quest carries who asked, who did it, what it cost and what was learned, and a solved problem becomes a skill the next agent loads without being told. A hundred parallel agents with no shared memory is a hundred times the same first day.
- Work needs to keep running after you close the laptop. Superset ships persistent terminal sessions and scheduled automations, but a finished worktree still leaves a diff, not the constraint discovered on the way or the fact that a different agent already tried this and failed.
- The job spans more than code: mail, decisions, a website, billing, and a server with your own name on it, in Germany, with EU data residency.
The difference in one sentence
Superset is a workspace where many coding agents work faster inside a company that already exists; AEQI is the company those agents work for — officer agents in named roles, a quest ledger, memory that outlives the session, and a server of its own, running whether or not anyone is at the keyboard.
Start a Company, free for three days →
Last verified 14 September 2026. Competitor facts are quoted from their public pages on that date.