What is the main difference between AEQI and Logicc?

Logicc is a secure AI workspace: one German-hosted, GDPR-compliant surface over ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral, with team chat, prebuilt and custom assistants, document and voice chat, and web search. What it delivers is a login your staff can safely use. AEQI delivers a running Company: agents in named roles doing the work, a quest ledger, memory that compounds, a live website, and a server provisioned for you. One gives your team a safer place to type; the other does the typing.

How does Logicc's pricing compare to AEQI's?

As of August 2026 Logicc charges per seat per month, ex VAT: Business €29.90, Secure+ €49.90 (their recommendation), Max €89.90, and custom Enterprise, with roughly 20% off annually, a fair-usage budget on every tier, and the strongest models reserved for the top tier. AEQI charges per Company, not per seat: €50, €200, and €800 a month for 1,250, 5,000, and 20,000 credits across 1, 4, and 16 seats. The shapes differ on purpose — a per-seat meter grows only when you hire more people, and AEQI is built for companies that intend to grow output without growing headcount.

Is AEQI GDPR-compliant and hosted in the EU?

Yes. Your Company's data is hosted in Germany, no model is trained on it, every agent runs in its own sandbox, and each Company gets its own storage. We publish our subprocessor list, offer a DPA on request for paid plans, and support EU data residency and private deployment for teams with stricter requirements. We also publish what we have not been issued: SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are in flight, not certified, and we will print the dates when they exist and not before. Our security page carries the detail.

Who should choose Logicc over AEQI?

An organisation whose immediate problem is that its staff cannot legally or safely use AI at all — a law firm, a medical practice, a public body, a finance team — and whose next step is to give thirty people one compliant window onto the frontier models, today, self-serve. Logicc solves that cleanly and cheaply. Choose AEQI when the problem is no longer access but capacity: when the work itself needs doing and there is nobody to do it.

AEQI vs Logicc

Logicc sells “secure AI for confidential company data”: one German-hosted, GDPR-compliant surface over ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral, with zero data retention and end-to-end encryption. Team chat, more than ninety prebuilt assistants, custom assistants, document and voice chat, web search. A Hamburg company, seed-funded in April 2026, selling into exactly the buyers who have spent two years being told no by their data protection officer.

That is a real problem solved well, and the buyer’s sentence is unambiguous: my staff can finally use AI without legal saying no. Every AEQI pilot in the EU has raised the same concerns. So this comparison starts by conceding the ground rather than contesting it.

Same jurisdiction, different deliverable

AEQI hosts in Germany too. Your Company’s data sits on EU infrastructure, no model trains on it, each agent runs sandboxed, each Company has its own storage, we publish our subprocessor list, and a DPA is available on request. We also publish what we have not been issued — SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are in flight and not certified, and no badge appears on our site before the report date exists. Compliance is a ticket to entry in this market, held by many vendors; it is not a wedge, and we will not pretend it is ours.

The difference is what changes hands. Logicc delivers a login. Nothing else moves: your team gets a safer window, and the work on the other side of the window is still theirs. AEQI delivers a running Company — agents holding named roles with their own tools and permissions, a quest ledger you can open and redirect, memory that compounds across every role, a live website, and a server with your own billing on it.

Their meter counts seats. Ours counts work.

This is the whole argument in one line, and it is arithmetic rather than positioning. Logicc charges €29.90, €49.90, or €89.90 per seat per month, ex VAT, with a fair-usage budget on each tier and the strongest models reserved for the top one. Revenue grows when you hire. A ten-person team on their recommended tier is roughly €499 a month for a chat window that ten people type into.

AEQI charges per Company: €50, €200, and €800 a month for 1,250, 5,000, and 20,000 credits at 1, 4, and 16 seats, with extra credits at €20 per 1,000. A credit is one cent of execution. The meter moves when work is done, not when a person is added — which means the ladder still makes sense for a company that grows output while headcount stays flat. A per-seat vendor structurally cannot tell that story without eating its own meter.

Read the anchor the right way round. The German mid-market has already demonstrated it will spend around €500 a month on “AI for the company.” The question is what it gets for the money.

Where Logicc is ahead today

Time to value and model breadth. Logicc is instant, self-serve, and free for seven days; you are typing into Claude behind a German data centre within minutes, and the router picks a model per request across four labs. Their assistant library is large and their entry price is genuinely low. If your organisation’s first job is to get thirty people legal access to frontier models this quarter, that is a clean purchase and AEQI is not the shorter path to it.

They are also further along on the specific documentation a procurement team asks for first. We are catching up on that in public, on our security page, with dates rather than intentions.

The verdict

Choose Logicc when the constraint is access: your people need a compliant place to use AI, and they need it now. Choose AEQI when the constraint is capacity: the work exists, nobody is doing it, and hiring is not the answer you want. A GDPR-clean chat window is still a chat window — the confidential document is safe, and the work is still yours.

All figures as of August 2026, taken from logicc.com and its public funding coverage.