aeqi vs Hyperagent

Hyperagent's headline is “Agents that ship real, powerful work,” and it earns the confidence. It comes from the team behind Airtable, launched publicly in February 2026, and the product is exactly what the line promises: autonomous agents, each in its own computing environment — real browsers, real shells — that take a brief and come back with a finished thing. Not a plan or a to-do list: a hosted website, a video, a slide deck, a hiring dashboard. The homepage publishes the receipts — a campaign strategy in 8 minutes for $6.41, a brand transformation in 15 minutes for $3.88.

And it is built to slot into a workflow that already exists. Hyperagent's own framing: agents work “using your data, your tools, and your style” and deliver wherever your team already works — @-mention one in Slack, message it on Telegram, trigger it by webhook or on a schedule. What Hyperagent sells, at bottom, is a workforce: tireless colleagues who ship.

The unit of the product

aeqi starts one level up. The question it answers isn't “who does the work” but “where does the work live.” Describe the business and a Company forms around it: roles with real permissions, agents staffed into them, a ledger of quests you can open and redirect at any moment, a live website, and a memory that belongs to the Company itself. The deliverables still get shipped — by agents, around the clock — but they land inside an entity that holds them, where decisions connect to earlier decisions and the record of why is part of the product.

Memory, and where it accumulates

Both products take memory seriously — worth saying plainly, because most agent tools don't. Hyperagent's agents “generate new memories and skills” as they work: the worker gets better at its job. aeqi attaches memory to the Company, not the worker: every decision, every lesson, every draft lands in one shared graph that any role can draw on — and that survives any single agent. The difference shows up in month three. A workforce that ships into Slack leaves its history in scrollback. A Company carries its history as structure: you can ask it what it did, and why, and it can answer.

What the price is a price of

As of July 2026, Hyperagent meters by usage: credits, billed per run — reported entry pricing starts around $20/month, and the homepage examples run from roughly $4 to $25 per task. aeqi publishes flat plans — $49, $190, and $490 per month, each with a set monthly credit capacity and a 3-day trial — and takes no percentage of what your Company earns. Neither model is a trick; they price different objects. Hyperagent prices the run. aeqi prices the standing Company.

Where Hyperagent is ahead today

As of July 2026: the finish and breadth of its deliverable formats — native video generation in particular — plus execution you can watch step by step, and per-run cost receipts published right on the homepage. Behind it sits the capital and pedigree of the Airtable team, and the Founding 500 program — $20,000 in inference credits for each of 500 founders building agent-first companies, a reported $10M commitment — says they are coming for new businesses too, not just existing teams. If your metric is finished artifacts per brief, Hyperagent is built to maximize it.

The verdict

Choose Hyperagent to give a team you already run a workforce that ships finished work into the tools you live in — it is one of the strongest versions of that idea on the market. Choose aeqi when the thing you're missing isn't another deliverable but the business itself: structure, a staffed team, a website, and a memory that makes month three smarter than week one. One sells you the work. The other runs the place the work belongs to.